<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writers' Editing Workshop &#187; book reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writerseditingworkshop.com/topic/books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writerseditingworkshop.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:13:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The First Five Pages, by Noah Lukeman</title>
		<link>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-the-first-five-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-the-first-five-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerseditingworkshop.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I&#8217;m looking over a manuscript that&#8217;s been submitted to me for publication, the first thing I do is read the first five pages. At that point, I might toss it, or I might decide to read more. Apparently I&#8217;m not the only editor to take this approach.
Noah Lukeman is a successful literary agent, with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/068485743X/cornucopiapress-20"><img src="http://www.writerseditingworkshop.com/books/images/first_five.jpg" alt="First Five Pages"/></a>When I&#8217;m looking over a manuscript that&#8217;s been submitted to me for publication, the first thing I do is read the first five pages. At that point, I might toss it, or I might decide to read more. Apparently I&#8217;m not the only editor to take this approach.</p>
<p>Noah Lukeman is a successful literary agent, with plenty of experience rejecting manuscripts. In <a class="booktitle" href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/068485743X/angelaharmsed-20">The First Five Pages</a> he shares that experience with the reader, giving good advice about how a manuscript can be improved in the revision process to make it more likely to be accepted. If you&#8217;re thinking of doing your own editing, read this first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-the-first-five-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woe Is I, by Patricia O&#8217;Connor</title>
		<link>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-woe-is-i/</link>
		<comments>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-woe-is-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerseditingworkshop.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;There are two kinds of editors. One sticks in that wherever it will fit. The other kind takes it out. They&#8217;re both wrong.&#34; &#8212; P. T. O&#8217;Connor
Woe is I is subtitled &#8220;The Grammarphobe&#8217;s Guide to Better English in Plain English,&#8221; and I can&#8217;t describe it better than that. O&#8217;Connor solves many of the stranger mysteries [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#34;There are two kinds of editors. One sticks in <strong>that</strong> wherever it will fit. The other kind takes it out. They&#8217;re both wrong.&#34; &mdash; P. T. O&#8217;Connor</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1594480060/cornucopiapress-20"><img src="http://www.writerseditingworkshop.com/books/images/woe_is_i.jpg" /></a><a class="booktitle" href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1594480060/cornucopiapress-20">Woe is I</a> is subtitled &#8220;The Grammarphobe&#8217;s Guide to Better English in Plain English,&#8221; and I can&#8217;t describe it better than that. O&#8217;Connor solves many of the stranger mysteries of English (&#8220;He resents me going&#8221; or &#8220;He resents my going&#8221;?) without resorting to the vocabulary of a high-school English teacher.<span id="more-10"></span></p>
<p>The last chapter, &#8220;Saying is Believing,&#8221; is a witty guide to making your writing clear.<br />These thirteen points, starting with &#8220;say what you have to say,&#8221; and &#8220;stop when you&#8217;ve said it,&#8221; give the writer concrete ways to improve his writing. These ten short pages are enough, on their own, to make the book worth reading and taking to heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-woe-is-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting the Words Right, by Theodore R. A. Cheney</title>
		<link>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-getting-the-words-right/</link>
		<comments>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-getting-the-words-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerseditingworkshop.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;A merely good piece of description can be transformed into a memorable one by cutting away what disguises it.&#34; &#8212; T.R.A. Cheney
Getting the Words Right is full of detailed explanations of how revision can improve a piece of writing. I&#8217;m especially fond of the first section, &#34;Reduce&#34;. (For more on that topic, see my article, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#34;A merely good piece of description can be transformed into a memorable one by cutting away what disguises it.&#34; &mdash; T.R.A. Cheney</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/158297358X/cornucopiapress-20"><img src="http://www.writerseditingworkshop.com/books/images/words_right.jpg" /></a><a class="booktitle" href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/158297358X/cornucopiapress-20">Getting the Words Right</a> is full of detailed explanations of how revision can improve a piece of writing. I&#8217;m especially fond of the first section, &#34;Reduce&#34;.<span id="more-9"></span> (For more on that topic, see my article, <a href="http://www.angelaharms.com/articles/SamuraiEditing.php">&#34;Samurai Editing&#34;</a>.)</p>
<p>But the later sections, &#34;Rearrange&#34; and &#34;Reword&#34;, are terrific as well, with plenty of concrete suggestions to make your writing shine. While some authors make recommendations that seem too vague to follow, Cheney doesn&#8217;t just tell writers to, for example, revise their word order. He tells <em>how</em> to do that, giving several examples of poor word order, and making clear just how and why he would revise them.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re hoping to improve your writing, or just to understand what good editing is all about, this book will help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/review-getting-the-words-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writing Down the Bones, by Natalie Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/writing-down-the-bones/</link>
		<comments>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/writing-down-the-bones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerseditingworkshop.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever written something really powerful, then later, when you wanted to write, thought, &#8220;How did I ever do that?&#8221; You try to reach that level again, and&#8230; nothing.

I was talking to a friend about this, and I said I was trying to figure out how to make those moments come. She told me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1590303164/ref=nosim?tag=cornucopiapress-20"><img src="http://writerseditingworkshop.com/books/images/writing_down_the_bones.jpg" alt="Writing Down the Bones" /></a>Have you ever written something really powerful, then later, when you wanted to write, thought, &#8220;How did I ever do that?&#8221; You try to reach that level again, and&#8230; nothing.</p>
<p><span id="more-8"></span></p>
<p>I was talking to a friend about this, and I said I was trying to figure out how to make those moments come. She told me that she listens to music (especially movie music), and then she recommended <a style="booktitle" href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1590303164/ref=nosim?tag=cornucopiapress-20">Writing Down the Bones</a>.</p>
<p>And there it was, on page 11:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;I attempted several times a month to write about my father dying. I was exploring and composting the material. Then suddenly, and I can&#8217;t say how, in December I sat transfixed at the Croissant Express in Minneapolis and a long poem about that subject poured out of me. All the disparate things I had to say were suddenly fused with energy and unity—a bright red tulip shot out of the compost.&#8221;</p>
<p>She shares with us the wisdom of her Zen master — teacher — Katagiri Roshi, who told her &#8220;It is very deep to have a cup of tea.&#8221; Don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s all so esoteric, though: At another moment, when she&#8217;d asked him about feelings of oneness and enlightenment that overtook her each time she tried to write, he told her &#8220;Oh, it&#8217;s just laziness. Get to work.&#8221;</p>
<p>Natalie Goldberg&#8217;s book will help get you unstuck just when you need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/writing-down-the-bones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Manual of Style</title>
		<link>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/chicago-manual-of-style/</link>
		<comments>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/chicago-manual-of-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerseditingworkshop.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chicago Manual of Style is probably the most relied-upon of all the style manuals, and is very comprehensive. It&#8217;s hefty, but worth picking up when you&#8217;re having trouble.
It&#8217;s not really as scary as it looks. You can get an idea of the common-sense approach the Chicago people take by checking out their Q&#38;A page.
Sure, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0226104036/ref=nosim?tag=cornucopiapress-20"><img src="http://writerseditingworkshop.com/books/images/chicago_manual_of_style.jpg" alt="Chicago Manual" /></a><a class="booktitle" href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0226104036/ref=nosim?tag=cornucopiapress-20">The Chicago Manual of Style</a> is probably the most relied-upon of all the style manuals, and is very comprehensive. It&#8217;s hefty, but worth picking up when you&#8217;re having trouble.<span id="more-7"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not really as scary as it looks. You can get an idea of the common-sense approach the Chicago people take by checking out their <a href="http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/CMS_FAQ/new/new_questions01.html">Q&amp;A</a> page.</p>
<p>Sure, there are more user-friendly options for writers, but for the professional editor, <span class="booktitle">The Chicago Manual</span> is indispensable. I use it to jog my memory, to solve sticky problems (like how to hyphenate &#8220;early twenty-first-century French furniture&#8221;) and to help with style decisions, along with <span class="booktitle&quot;">The Associated Press Stylebook</span> and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://writerseditingworkshop.com/2008/04/chicago-manual-of-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
